There’s no one way to be a Zionist: Six different types of Zionism (Part 2)

"From this center, the spirit of Judaism will radiate...to all the communities of the Diaspora, to inspire them with new life and to preserve the overall unity of our people."
The Italian-Jewish conductor Arturo Toscanini thanks Bronislaw Huberman, the founder of the Palestine Symphony Orchestra, at the opening concert in Tel Aviv in 1936. Huberman, who foresaw the Holocaust, persuaded 75 Jewish musicians from major European orchestras to immigrate to Palestine, creating what he called the “materialization of the Zionist culture in the fatherland.” (Photo by Abraham Pisarek via Getty Images)

We’re curious…

Is Zionism about fulfilling a divine promise to the ancient Israelites, creating a vibrant Jewish culture, or ensuring the safety of Jews around the world?

In his book, “The Zionist Ideas: Visions for the Jewish Homeland — Then, Now, Tomorrow,” Gil Troy puts forth six schools of Zionist thought: Political, Labor, Revisionist, Religious, Cultural and Diaspora Zionism. Let’s explore the three final schools of thought (read part one for the first three).

Religious Zionism 

Religious Zionists developed the religious case for establishing a Jewish state. To understand this school of thought, you need to understand the moment in Jewish history when it began.

The situation looked something like this: With antisemitism, misery and disappointment growing throughout Europe, some young Jews decided to take action. They insisted that the time to return home and build a Jewish nation — with their own hands — had arrived.

These Zionist chalutzim — the secular pioneers who settled the land of Israel in the early 1900s — were also fiercely anti-religious. They didn’t observe Shabbat or keep Kosher, and they saw Jewish law as antiquated.

Many religious Jews opposed the efforts of these self-proclaimed “New Jews.” First, they disagreed with their secular ideology and vision for the new Jewish state. Would secular society replace traditional Jewish life in this new state? Would religious Jews be welcome there?

Second, many religious Jews believed that it was forbidden to establish a Jewish state in the land of Israel before the coming of the Messiah. They believed that Zionism violated the “Three Oaths” found in the Talmud, in which the Jews were sworn not to reclaim the Land of Israel by force.

Religious Zionism developed in this context. One of the first leaders of this school of thought was Rabbi Isaac Jacob Reines, who argued that “It is the duty and obligation of every Jew to join” the Zionist movement.

Reines made his case to his fellow religious Jews on two grounds. First, Zionism was a movement to rescue Jews whose lives were in danger. Jews had never refrained from working together in such situations in the past, he pointed out.

Second, Reines argued that Torah was at the center of Zionism. Establishing a Jewish state was a means of achieving religious objectives. It was only in Israel that the Jewish people could observe all of the mitzvot (commandments).

While Reines took a more pragmatic approach to the antisemitism of his day, Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook (commonly known as Rav Kook) offered a more messianic, spiritual version of religious Zionism. For him, Zionism was the beginning of a messianic redemption.

Rav Kook viewed the land of Israel as intrinsically valuable and holy. He spoke romantically about how the land was inseparable from “the soul of the Jewish people.”

Eretz Yisra’el is part of the very essence of our nationhood; it is bound organically to its very life and inner being,” Rav Kook wrote in the early 1900s.

He further argued that it was the only place where Jews could develop to their full potential. “Jewish original creativity, whether in the realm of ideas or in the arena of daily life and action, is impossible except in Eretz Yisrael,” Rav Kook wrote.

Although the secular Zionist pioneers did not share this religious theology, Rav Kook saw them as critical partners in rebuilding the land and the Jewish people.

“We need to bind together all Jews, from the oldest rabbi of Jerusalem to the youngest laborer of Poriah,” he said in 1913.

Both Reines and Rav Kook reminded their fellow Zionist leaders that the rise of the political Zionist movement wasn’t the first chapter of the story — it was actually the culmination of a much longer one starting in the Torah.

They were always aware of the direct line between the divine promise of the land to the ancient Israelites, and the modern Zionist movement. After two thousand years spent in exile, Zionism was fulfilling that ancient promise.

Cultural Zionism

While Political, Labor, Revisionist and Religious Zionists prioritized the need for a Jewish state (albeit with different visions of what that state would look like), Cultural Zionists focused on a different starting point.

For Cultural Zionists, what the Jewish people really needed was a regeneration of national Jewish culture, and this had to precede the creation of a political state. They still wanted a Jewish state in the future, but they had a different immediate goal.

Cultural Zionists were much more interested in building a national Jewish culture. They envisioned a Jewish world in Israel and the Diaspora that was learned in Jewish history and Jewish texts, fluent in Hebrew, and producing literature, music and art.

They sought a cultural revival of the entire Jewish people and they didn’t feel a political state was necessary to achieve that. They also harbored doubts that this crazy idea to establish a Jewish state would succeed.

Many Cultural Zionists also warned their colleagues of the difficulties that would come with establishing a state in the land of Israel. For example, seeing the impending conflict with the Arabs, Martin Buber argued that there must be Arab-Jewish reconciliation before a state was established. 

Rather than a political state, Cultural Zionists wanted to create a new Jewish spiritual center in the land of Israel. They hoped that this spiritual and cultural “hub” would inspire the rest of the Jewish world.

“From this center, the spirit of Judaism will radiate to the great circumference, to all the communities of the Diaspora, to inspire them with new life and to preserve the overall unity of our people,” Ahad Ha’am, the founder of this school of thought, imagined in 1897.

“When our national culture in Palestine has attained that level, we may be confident that it will produce men [and women] in the land of Israel itself who will be able, at a favorable moment, to establish a State there — one which will be not merely a state of Jews but a really Jewish state,” he added.

(This was a subtle dig at Political Zionist leader Theodor Herzl, whose work “Der Judenstaat” literally means “The State of the Jews” in German.)

Meanwhile, in 1932, the poet Hayyim Nahman Bialik expressed the idea of Cultural Zionism this way: “Everything that is created in the Land of Israel by Jews becomes culture.”

According to historian Gil Troy, “Most Zionists rejected [Ahad Ha’am’s] views as elitist and defeatist, especially in light of Theodor Herzl’s vision of political rebirth” and the rampant antisemitism of the day.

“Still, many Jews in Palestine embraced this ‘spiritual’ or ‘cultural’ Zionism, understanding that a Jewish state without a rich spiritual and cultural life would be like a person without a soul.”

One of the most prominent Cultural Zionists was Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, who led the revival of Hebrew as a spoken language after it was essentially dead for 2,000 years. 

Ben-Yehuda believed the Jewish people could not unite or thrive without a common language (specifically, Hebrew). Jews “cannot become a living nation without returning to their ancestral language” and using that language “in everyday discourse…in all facets of life,” he wrote.

Ben-Yehuda and his wife Dvora established the world’s first strictly Hebrew-speaking household in almost 2,000 years. Then, after his wife passed away, he and his second wife Hemda created the first modern Hebrew dictionary, helping to kick off the revival of the ancient language.

Diaspora Zionism

Diaspora Zionists reconciled patriotism to the different countries they called home with Jewish nationalism.

They expanded the definition of a “Zionist” to include those who supported the idea of Jewish nationalism. To be a Zionist, they insisted, you didn’t necessarily need to be a pioneer in the land of Israel, building the Jewish homeland.

You could also be a proud Jewish citizen of America, Australia, Britain or another country — with no intentions of ever living in the land of Israel — who supported and believed in the goals of Zionism. You could be a Jew living in the Diaspora who wanted to ensure that Jews around the world would have a homeland.

In America, Jewish leaders like former U.S. Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis and Hadassah founder Henrietta Szold insisted that there was no contradiction between being a proud American and a proud Zionist.

“Let no American imagine that Zionism is inconsistent with Patriotism,” Brandeis declared in 1915. “Multiple loyalties are objectionable only if they are inconsistent.”

Taking this one step further, Brandeis argued that Zionism actually made Jewish Americans better citizens.

“Every Irish American who contributed toward advancing home rule was a better man and a better American for the sacrifice he made. Every American Jew who aids in advancing the Jewish settlement in Palestine…will likewise be a better man and a better American for doing so,” he explained.

Meanwhile, Sir John Monash, the president of the Australian Zionist Federation, called on his fellow Jews in Australia to join the Zionist cause.

“We have joined our fellow Jews all over the world in the task of building up the Jewish Homeland,” he declared in 1928. “As Jews living in Australia…we have to do our share in rebuilding the land of Israel and reviving the cultural and spiritual center of Judaism.”

Meanwhile, Baltimore-born Henrietta Szold wrote that a Jewish state would not only bring “immediate blessing” to Jews in distress (who would have a refuge): it would also benefit Jews who chose to live in other countries.

“Those [of us who remain] in a happy, prosperous country will be free to draw spiritual nourishment from a center dominated wholly by Jewish traditions and the Jewish ideals of universal peace,” she imagined in 1915.

More on this

Topics in this article